Mexican American War Essay Sample free essay sample

1. How did American life during the period of the Age of the Common Man reflect both the influence of the frontier and the impact of newer rationalistic constructs? ( Think innovations. faith. peace. prosperity. literature. art. instruction. etc ) 2. Briefly define ( no more than 1 paragraph each. some are a sentence or two ) : -The Mexican American War: The Mexican-American war was a battle for chap between the Untied States and Mexico where the United States defeated Mexico and gained over five 100 1000 stat mis of land. The land in known as the Southwest and makes up a huge bulk of the United States. A major subscriber to the war was the American belief of Manifest Destiny and showed how the United States wanted to widen their boundary lines to the Pacific. The skill of the land did open up much room for American colony. but it besides worsened the struggle between the North and South on whether or non the new district would be slave of free. Not able to hold on this job the two sides declared war on each other and it finally brought upon the Civil War of 1861. ( hypertext transfer protocol: //dig. lib. niu. edu/mexicanwar/overview. hypertext markup language ) -The Wilmot Proviso: This was a proviso non leting bondage in the district that the United States gained in the Mexican American War. The proviso was proposed by a representative from Pennsylvania named David Wilmot in 1846. Congress denied the provision and in consequence neer went into consequence. ( World Wide Web. ohiohistorycentral. org ) -The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo: With the terminal of the Mexican American war came the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. The papers was signed on February 2. 1848 in the town of Guadalupe Hidalgo. ( World Wide Web. archives. gov ) -Compromise of 1850: The via media was composed of five different Torahs to cover with bondage issues. This papers was proposed by Henry Clay in order to decide the issue of California come ining the Union as a free province. The Fugitive Slave Act was amended and slave trade in Washington D. C was banned. Then a territorial authorities was created in Utah. so eventually an act that settled the boundary difference between Texas and Mexico. ( World Wide Web. loc. gov ) -Kansas Nebraska Act: This was an act to take the Missouri Compromise which allowed b ondage in the country straight north of the 36 30 line. There was much convulsion between slave proprietors and the free provinces and was a conducive factor to the Civil War. ( World Wide Web. loc. gov ) -The Dred Scott determination: The Dred Scott determination was a supreme tribunal determination that was issued on March 6. 1857 saying that slaves could non action and were non to be considered citizens of the United States. With the determination. the Missouri Compromise was considered unconstitutional and that Congress shouldn’t have the authorization to censor bondage in their part. The 13th and 14th amendments so came to be with this determination. ( World Wide Web. loc. gov ) -Freeport Doctrine- This philosophy was written by Stephen Douglas and stated that bondage could be excluded by districts of the United States. this was a was to derive retaliation of the Dred Scott determination. ( World Wide Web. encyclopaedia. com ) -Harper’s Ferry- In October 1859 John Brown and 18 others raided the federal armory in Haperâ €™s Ferry. Virginia. His concluding behind this was he thought that the slaves would come to assist his cause and disobey their Masterss. but no slaves accompanied him. Brown was found guilty of lese majesty and was hanged publically. ( World Wide Web. mce. k12tn. net/civilwar ) 3. To what extent can the Civil War be accounted for as a battle between two counter economic systems? Include political branchings. representation equity. economic and educational issues – item and support of your thoughts is really of import here. The North and the South were in a changeless stuggle for both power and representation in Congress. The two sides had wholly different position points and handled concern really otherwise. The North was a free province and the South was a slave province. Each province had representatives that acted as the interpreter for the province. The North didnt want the South to hold more representation and the South felt the same about the North. So whenever the Union added a province the Confederacy wanted to add a slave province. This went back and Forth until the Civil War began. The Union earned their income with industry and doing many necessities. where the South relied to a great extent on baccy. cotton. and the most debatable bondage. The South besides wanted 3/5 of every slave to number as a adult male and be used to stand for the province in Congressional affairs. The Union would non hold with this what so of all time and wholly close this thought down. The South had a lower population. had a little railway system. did non bring forth much steel or Fe. had less wealth. less valuable exports. less mills. but had the bulk of all farming area in the United States. The instruction difference was a major difference excessively. The Northerners were more educated and had a much more to offer educationally. In the South they entirely relied on the farm and what type of merchandise it was bring forthing. Even though the South did non hold everything the North did. they were content and were non in the temper for any alteration at all. ( civilwar. org ) 4. Distinguish between the Lincoln Reconstruction Plan. the Johnson Reconstruction Plan. and the Congressional Reconstruction Plan. which do you believe should hold been applied? Explain to the full. The Lincoln Reconstruction Plan was to be every bit fleet as possible and consisted of three chief points a general forgiveness would be given to everyone in the South who would take an curse of trueness to the Union and the United States as a whole and to obey all bondage Torahs. He besides stated that each high ranking Confederate functionary would be dismissed from the procedure. Finally with one ten percent of a popular ballot of those who voted in 1860. the province would be able to set forth their ain authorities and selected their ain functionaries. ( www. u-s-history. com ) The Johnson Reconstruction Plan was the program issued after Lincoln’s blackwash and would include: all forgivenesss would be given if a trueness curse was recited. Then there would be no forgivenesss g iven to any high ranking Confederate functionaries or any citizen owning a belongings valued at $ 20. 000. After that each province must wholly get rid of bondage before being readmitted and was required to reexamine their withdrawing authorization before being readmitted. ( www. u-s-history. com ) The Congressional Reconstruction Plan or the Extremist Reconstruction Plan was a Congress based program that placed former Confederate provinces under military power and divided the provinces into five territories. A separate Union general was placed in each territory and ran each. The Army would move as the authorities until a new authorities was put in topographic point. The military made the Confederated followed mandated orders and was in charge of voting for grownup males including African Americans. After that Congress declared their right to hold ultimate power over the provinces and was highlighted in the Texas v. White instance of 1869. All new Confederate authoritiess were non allowed to set former high ranking functionaries into power. Finally all new provinces were to sign the 14th amendment. ( World Wide Web. tdl. org ) I think the Congressional Reconstruction Plan best suited the United States. Lincoln’s was merely to loosen up. The state about fell apart so the lone thing to make was something extremist. 5. Was Lincoln’s issue of the Emancipation Proclamation a contradiction of his earlier profession that the Civil War was being waged non for the devastation of bondage but for the saving of the Union? Explain to the full as you can. Abraham Lincoln has a great repute and is known to be the 1 who set the slaves free. Although he played a major function on the abolition of bondage. his first purposes were non ever swayed toward that determination. Before the Emancipation Proclamation Lincoln said to a Cincinnati crowd in 1859 â€Å"I now assure you. that I neither†¦ had. nor have had. any intent in any manner of interfering with the instirution†¦Ã¢â‚¬  or another illustration to an editor at the New York Times â€Å"My paramount object in this battle is to salvage the Union. and is non either to salvage or destruct bondage. † These statements from Lincoln show clearly that he had other thoughts about what should and would be done with bondage. Something between 1859 and 1863 wholly changed his head and came to a realisation that a cheeky determination should be made. So in 1863 the Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclaimation. He had been formulatating his program and cognize befre any other American what was in shop. Lincoln did non desire to interfer with the slave trade. but realized that the Union could and would non last unless bondage was wholly abolished. Many critize Lincoln and say no slaves were even emancipated on the twenty-four hours of its declaration and merely certain slaves that were in rebellious provinces were consider to be free. The Emancipation Proclamation was non a contadiction to any ealier statements. it was a program that merely Lincoln knew approximately. He knew the biggest job was bondage and alteration needed to be made. ( wuod. lib. umich. edu )